Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Perceived Barriers for the Compliance of Standard Precautions among Medical and Nursing Students in Central India
Open Access
- 12 April 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 20 (8) , 5487
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare (a) the knowledge, attitude, and practice of standard precautions (SPs), (b) the knowledge of post-exposure management, and (c) the perceived barriers underlying the noncompliance with SPs among future healthcare professionals (HCPs), i.e., students of medical and nursing courses in Central India. Setting and participants: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017–2018 among students of a medical and a nursing college using a pretested and modified questionnaire. Data were collected during 23 face-to-face sessions. Responses were scored according to standard guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and WHO, where each correct response was given a score of 1. Results: Among 600 participants, 51% of medical students and 75% of nursing students could not select the correct definition of SPs from the given options. Sixty-five percent of medical students (275/423) and 82% of nursing students (145/177) were unaware of the term post-exposure prophylaxis. Overall, knowledge about personal protective equipment and hazard symbols was poor (<25%). Furthermore, although theoretical knowledge about hand hygiene was good (510/600; 85%), its implementation was poor (<30%). Sixty-four percent of participants believed that the use of hand rub replaced the need for handwashing, even for visibly soiled hands. Some of the participants believed that the use of PPE might offend patients (16%). High workload and poor knowledge were other significant barriers underlying the noncompliance with SPs. Conclusions: A suboptimal translation of participants’ knowledge into practice is evident and signifies the presence of the know–do gap. Poor knowledge and inappropriate presumptions about the use of SPs discourage the practice of SPs. This results in increased healthcare-associated infections, increased treatment costs, and a suppressed social economy. The inclusion of a dedicated curriculum with repeated hands-on and practice-based training on SPs is suggested to minimize this know–do gap among future healthcare workers.Keywords
Funding Information
- Swedish Research (2017-01327, 2021-00889)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship between patient safety climate and adherence to standard precautionsAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2016
- Awareness and low uptake of post exposure prophylaxis for HIV among clinical medical students in a high endemicity settingBMC Public Health, 2015
- Staff Perception on Biomedical or Health Care Waste Management: A Qualitative Study in a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital in IndiaPLOS ONE, 2015
- A step-wise approach towards introduction of an alcohol based hand rub, and implementation of front line ownership- using a, rural, tertiary care hospital in central India as a modelBMC Health Services Research, 2015
- Hospital organisation, management, and structure for prevention of health-care-associated infection: a systematic review and expert consensusThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2015
- Compliance of Healthcare Workers with Hand Hygiene Practices in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Overt ObservationInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, 2014
- Knowledge and Practice of Standard Precautions and Awareness Regarding Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV among Interns of a Medical College in West Bengal, IndiaOman Medical Journal, 2013
- Standard Precautions and Infection Control, Medical Students' Knowledge and Behavior at a Saudi University: The Need for ChangeGlobal Journal of Health Science, 2013
- Healthcare - associated infections: A public health problemNigerian Medical Journal, 2012
- Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2011