Small modern farmers: Neither peasants nor fully‐fledged capitalists?
Author:
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Vol. 15 (3) , 350-372
Abstract
This article discusses several previous attempts to theorise the so‐called capitalised family farm, and proposes an alternative approach to the subject. Petty capitalist production is posited as a category embracing all productive forms experiencing capital accumulation and worked by their owners with some hiring of additional labourers. The varied geneses, trajectories and performances of these productive forms are explained by means of a multiple determination in which market structures and forms of regulation play a significant role. The theoretical inquiry is briefly illustrated by historical data from five Venezuelan case studies.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unfree labour and capitalist restructuring in the Agrarian sector: Peru and IndiaThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1986
- Two Paths of Agrarian Capitalism, or a Critique of Chayanovian MarxismComparative Studies in Society and History, 1986
- There is nothing simple about simple commodity productionThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1983
- The Political Economy of Food: The Rise and Fall of the Postwar International Food OrderAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Relations of production of the ‘family farm’: Canadian prairiesThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1981
- Household production and the national economy: Concepts for the analysis of Agrarian formationsThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1980
- African peasantries: A theoretical framework∗The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1979
- Simple commodity production and wage labour in the American plains∗The Journal of Peasant Studies, 1978
- World Market, State, and Family Farm: Social Bases of Household Production in the Era of Wage LaborComparative Studies in Society and History, 1978
- ‘Peasantry’ as an economic categoryThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1977