Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
Open Access
Abstract
Introduction The UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no previous studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on mental health. Because payments are targeted at low-income households, impacts on mental health will have important consequences for health inequalities. Methods and analysis We will conduct a mixed methods study. Work package (WP) 1 will compare health outcomes for new recipients of UC with outcomes for legacy benefit recipients in two large population surveys, using the phased rollout of UC as a natural experiment. We will also analyse the relationship between the proportion of UC claimants in small areas and a composite measure of mental health. WP2 will use data collected by Citizen’s Advice to explore the sociodemographic and health characteristics of people who seek advice when claiming UC and identify features of the claim process that prompt advice-seeking. WP3 will conduct longitudinal in-depth interviews with up to 80 UC claimants in England and Scotland to explore reasons for claiming and experiences of the claim process. Up to 30 staff supporting claimants will also be interviewed. WP4 will use a dynamic microsimulation model to simulate the long-term health impacts of different implementation scenarios. WP5 will undertake cost–consequence analysis of the potential costs and outcomes of introducing UC and cost–benefit analyses of mitigating actions. Ethics and dissemination We obtained ethical approval for the primary data gathering from the University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, application number 400200244. We will use our networks to actively disseminate findings to UC claimants, the public, practitioners and policy-makers, using a range of methods and formats. Trial registration number The study is registered with the Research Registry: researchregistry6697.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Public Health Research Programme (NIHR131709)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explanation in causal inference: developments in mediation and interactionInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2016
- Estimating causal effects: considering three alternatives to difference-in-differences estimationHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2016
- Introduction of a National Minimum Wage Reduced Depressive Symptoms in Low-Wage Workers: A Quasi-Natural Experiment in the UKHealth Economics, 2016
- ‘First, do no harm’: are disability assessments associated with adverse trends in mental health? A longitudinal ecological studyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2015
- Money matters: using qualitative research for policy influencing on gender and welfare reformInnovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2013
- Picturing commuting: photovoice and seeking well-being in everyday travelQualitative Research, 2013
- Methods for dealing with time‐dependent confoundingStatistics in Medicine, 2012
- Is the aim of the English health care system to maximize QALYs?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2012
- Estimating causal effects from epidemiological dataJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research NoteJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1997