Machine Learning Line Bundle Cohomology
Top Cited Papers
- 27 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Fortschritte der Physik
- Vol. 68 (1)
Abstract
We investigate different approaches to machine learning of line bundle cohomology on complex surfaces as well as on Calabi‐Yau three‐folds. Standard function learning based on simple fully connected networks with logistic sigmoids is reviewed and its main features and shortcomings are discussed. It has been observed recently that line bundle cohomology can be described by dividing the Picard lattice into certain regions in each of which the cohomology dimension is described by a polynomial formula. Based on this structure, we set up a network capable of identifying the regions and their associated polynomials, thereby effectively generating a conjecture for the correct cohomology formula. For complex surfaces, we also set up a network which learns certain rigid divisors which appear in a recently discovered master formula for cohomology dimensions.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Topological data analysis for the string landscapeJournal of High Energy Physics, 2019
- Machine learning line bundle cohomologies of hypersurfaces in toric varietiesPhysics Letters B, 2019
- Machine learning CICY threefoldsPhysics Letters B, 2018
- Machine-learning the string landscapePhysics Letters B, 2017
- Machine learning in the string landscapeJournal of High Energy Physics, 2017
- Machine learning of Calabi-Yau volumesPhysical Review D, 2017
- Evolving neural networks with genetic algorithms to study the string landscapeJournal of High Energy Physics, 2017
- The moduli space of heterotic line bundle models: a case study for the tetra-quadricJournal of High Energy Physics, 2014
- Cohomology of line bundles: A computational algorithmJournal of Mathematical Physics, 2010
- Heterotic compactification, an algorithmic approachJournal of High Energy Physics, 2007