Cost-benefit analysis of a regional poison center
- 20 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Toxicology
- Vol. 46 (5) , 450-456
Abstract
Background. Funding poison center (PC) operations has become a major challenge nationwide. Increasingly, state and federal budget cuts have resulted in diminished funding to PCs. Objectives. In an effort to demonstrate the value of current PC phone services, a cost-benefit analysis of a regional center was completed. Methods. A telephone survey was used to collect data from PC callers during an 8-week period in 2004. Callers with human exposure poisonings determined by the PC to be of minimal or no risk were asked to complete the phone survey. Callers were asked their alternative plan if the PC staff had not been available to assist them. Benefits were measured as healthcare charges potentially avoided. Results: A total of 652 caller surveys were completed. The benefit-to-cost ratio was 7.67 (95% C.I. 6.83, 8.50). Conclusion. In addition to non-monetary benefits, the operation of a regional poison center provides significant positive return on investment.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2005 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poisoning and Exposure DatabaseClinical Toxicology, 2006
- The Costs and Outcomes of Restricting Public Access to Poison Control CentersMedical Care, 1998
- Costs of Poisoning in the United States and Savings From Poison Control Centers: A Benefit-Cost AnalysisAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Editorial Comment: Fiscal Antidotes NeededJournal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 1994