Urban Circularity and Knowledge Territories in Latin America: Governance and Social Participation in Sustainable Mobility
Preprint
- 19 March 2026
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
The intensification of urbanization and the environmental crisis highlight the need for new paradigms of sustainable urban development, in which mobility plays a central role. This article analyzes sustainable urban mobility initiatives in Latin American knowledge territories through a comparative framework that integrates Knowledge-Based Urban Development (KBUD) and urban circularity principles. Grounded in the Fourth-Generation Knowledge Territories (TC4) perspective, the study focuses on governance models and social participation as drivers of transformative mobility practices. Methodologically, it adopts a qualitative and exploratory case study approach, combining primary data from field visits with secondary sources such as legislation, institutional documents, and technical reports. Despite the proliferation of science parks and innovation districts in Latin America, little is known about how governance and social participation shape sustainable mobility initiatives in these contexts, particularly when analyzed through the combined lenses of KBUD and urban circularity. The comparative analysis reveals varying degrees of openness and limitations in urban mobility governance across the three territories selected (distritotec-Mexico, Parque Patricios-Argentina, e Porto Digital-Brazil). The findings reveal distinct governance configurations and degrees of alignment with circular mobility principles. Distritotec stands out for its multistakeholder governance and community-led mobility initiatives, reflecting efforts to operationalize the quintuple helix model. Parque Patricios shows fragmented integration between infrastructure improvements and participatory planning, while Porto Digital presents limited articulation between innovation policies and sustainable mobility, with centralized governance and low public engagement. Persistent challenges observed throughout the cases include the weak institutionalization of citizen participation, insufficient strategies to disincentivize private car use, and a lack of data governance mechanisms.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Version 1, 2026-03-19, Preprints
- Published version: Sustainability, 18 (10), 4888.
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring the Doughnut: A good life for all is possible within planetary boundariesJournal of Cleaner Production, 2024
- Planning beyond growth: The case for economic democracy within ecological limitsJournal of Cleaner Production, 2023
- On the road to urban degrowth economics? Learning from the experience of C40 cities, doughnut cities, Transition Towns, and shrinking citiesCities, 2023
- Citizens’ engagement in smart cities for promoting circular economy. A Knowledge based frameworkITM Web of Conferences, 2023
- Downscaling doughnut economics for sustainability governanceCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2022
- Collaborative Decision-Making Processes for Local Innovation: The CoULL Methodology in Living Labs Approach2022
- Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approachLand Use Policy, 2018
- Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation districtUrban Research & Practice, 2018
- Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance: Results from the international comparison of HelsinkiCities, 2013
- The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovationJournal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2012