Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) success rates in patients with elevated body mass index: a comparative study
Authors:
- 9 September 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Urolithiasis
- Vol. 51 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered gold standard treatment of renal stones larger than 20 mm. Several studies have shown that ultrasound guidance during this procedure is more effective and safer than fluoroscopy. A higher body mass index (BMI) can make ultrasound-guided renal access more difficult and unsuccessful. We present a prospective analysis and comparison of ultrasound-guided PCNL in patients with normal and increased body mass index. We performed a prospective comparison of patients who underwent ultrasound-guided PCNL to remove renal stones by a single surgeon between 2020 and 2022. Patients with BMIs greater than 30 (mean 33.87—obese) were compared to those with BMIs less than 30 (mean 25.69—non-obese). Demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected, analyzed, and included in this study. Total of 98 consecutive patients, with 49 patients in each group were analyzed. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of stone volume (P = 0.085), stone density (P = 0.5590), location of renal access (P = 0.108), surgery duration (P = 0.38), blood loss (P = 0.54), or laboratory changes after surgery (P = 0.60). 87.76% of obese patients were stone free per CT scan at follow-up, compared to 73.47% of normal-weight patients (P = 0.1238). According to Clavien–Dindo classification, six patients in the non-obese group experienced grade II (10%) and grade III (2%) complications, as opposed to six patients in the obese group with grade I (2%), grade II (6%), and grade III (2%) complications. There was no significant correlation between body mass index and the success or safety of ultrasound-guided PCNL. Although more challenging, a higher BMI should not be an impediment to performing this approach. This method is safe, with no increased incidence of postoperative complications or compromise in stone-free status postoperatively and can diminish or avoid both patient’s and medical team’s exposure to ionizing radiation.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: Fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy?Indian Journal of Urology, 2013
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Obese Patients: Comparison Between the Prone and Total Supine PositionJournal of Endourology, 2012
- Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stonesArab Journal of Urology, 2012
- The CROES Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: The Influence of Body Mass Index on OutcomeJournal of Urology, 2012
- The Association of Increasing Body Mass Index and Kidney Stone DiseaseJournal of Urology, 2010
- Role of overweight and obesity on the urinary excretion of promoters and inhibitors of stone formation in stone formersUrological Research, 2008
- Ultrasonographic versus Fluoroscopic Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical TrialJournal of Endourology, 2008
- Renal Access by Urologist or Radiologist for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy—Is it Still an Issue?Journal of Urology, 2007
- Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Effective Approach to High-Risk and Morbidly Obese PatientsJournal of Endourology, 2007
- METABOLIC RISK FACTORS AND THE IMPACT OF MEDICAL THERAPY ON THE MANAGEMENT OF NEPHROLITHIASIS IN OBESE PATIENTSJournal of Urology, 2004