Is Sovereign Wealth Fund Investment Destabilizing?
Preprint
- 1 June 2010
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We investigate whether accusations by the popular press regarding the potential destabilizing force of sovereign wealth fund (SWF) investment have merit. SWF investments are associated with a reduction in the compensation of risk over the five-year term examined. Firm volatility decomposition suggests that it is mainly idiosyncratic risk that drives these impacts. Granger causality results suggest that SWFs are poorly informed in their investments (compared to the market) or they have nonfinancial motivations. There is no evidence that the media coverage precedes the poor performance. These findings suggest that SWF investment could be potentially destabilizing.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fire sale acquisitions: Myth vs. realityJournal of Banking & Finance, 2011
- International Stock Return ComovementsThe Journal of Finance, 2009
- The Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds2009
- Variation in the Monitoring Incentives of Outside StockholdersThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2006
- The Cross‐Section of Volatility and Expected ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2006
- Does financial liberalization spur growth?Journal of Financial Economics, 2005
- Emerging markets financeJournal of Empirical Finance, 2003
- Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statisticsJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- The Pricing Effects of Interfirm Cash Tender OffersThe Journal of Finance, 1987