Genetic program activity delineates risk, relapse, and therapy responsiveness in Multiple Myeloma
Authors:
- Matthew A. WallMWMatthew A. Wall
- Serdar TurkarslanSTSerdar Turkarslan
- Wei-Ju WuWWWei-Ju Wu
- Samuel A. DanzigerSDSamuel A. Danziger
- David J. ReissDRDavid J. Reiss
- Mike J. MasonMMMike J. Mason
- Andrew P. DervanADAndrew P. Dervan
- Matthew W.B. TrotterMTMatthew W.B. Trotter
- Douglas BassettDBDouglas Bassett
- Robert M. HershbergRHRobert M. Hershberg
- Adrián López García de LomanaALAdrián López García de Lomana
- Alexander V. RatushnyARAlexander V. Ratushny
Preprint
Abstract
Despite recent advancements in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), nearly all patients ultimately relapse and many become refractory to their previous therapies. Although many therapies exist with diverse mechanisms of action, it is not yet clear how the differences in MM biology across patients impacts the likelihood of success for existing therapies and those in the pipeline. Therefore, we not only need the ability to predict which patients are at high risk for disease progression, but also a means to understand the mechanisms underlying their risk. We hypothesized that knowledge of the biological networks that give rise to MM, specifically the transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) and the mechanisms by which mutations impact gene regulation, would enable improved predictions of disease progression and actionable insights for treatment. Here we present a method to infer TRNs from multi-omics data and apply it to the generation of a MM TRN that links chromosomal abnormalities and somatic mutations to downstream effects on gene expression via perturbation of transcriptional regulators. We find that 141 genetic programs underlie the disease and that the activity profile of these programs fall into one of 25 distinct transcriptional states. These transcriptional signatures prove to be more predictive of outcomes than do mutations and reveal plausible mechanisms for relapse, including the establishment of an immuno-suppressive microenvironment. Moreover, we observe subtype-specific vulnerabilities to interventions with existing drugs and motivate the development of new targeted therapies that appear especially promising for relapsed refractory MM.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: npj Precision Oncology, 5 (1), 1.
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Multiple Myeloma Drug Pipeline—2018: A Review of Small Molecules and Their Therapeutic TargetsClinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, 2018
- Rapidly changing myeloma epidemiology in the general population: Increased incidence, older patients, and longer survivalEuropean Journal of Haematology, 2018
- NCCN Guidelines Insights: Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2018Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2018
- Multiple myelomaNature Reviews Disease Primers, 2017
- Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implicationsNature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2016
- Current treatment landscape for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myelomaNature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2014
- Widespread Genetic Heterogeneity in Multiple Myeloma: Implications for Targeted TherapyCancer Cell, 2014
- Epidemiology of Multiple Myeloma2011
- Multiple MyelomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- The molecular classification of multiple myelomaBlood, 2006