Intracortical microstimulation in humans: a decade of safety and efficacy
Authors:
- Charles M. GreensponCGCharles M. Greenspon
- Taylor G. HobbsTHTaylor G. Hobbs
- Ceci VerbaarschotCVCeci Verbaarschot
- Ali H. AlamriAAAli H. Alamri
- Natalya D. ShelchkovaNSNatalya D. Shelchkova
- Robin LienkämperRLRobin Lienkämper
- Joel YeJYJoel Ye
- Tyler W. SimpsonTSTyler W. Simpson
- Jeffrey M. WeissJWJeffrey M. Weiss
- David M. WeirDWDavid M. Weir
- Debbie E. HarringtonDHDebbie E. Harrington
- Ashley Van DriescheADAshley Van Driesche
Preprint
Abstract
Background: Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex can restore a sense of touch to people with spinal cord injury (SCI). In this early-feasibility clinical trial, we evaluate the safety, efficacy, and longevity of ICMS as there is a paucity of such long-term studies in humans. This information is crucial to the development of clinical neuromodulation devices, particularly for restoring touch, hearing, and vision. Methods: ICMS was delivered to five participants with SCI who were each implanted with two Blackrock NeuroPort microelectrode arrays in the hand representation of Brodmann’s Area 1. Across implant durations spanning two to ten years, we measured single-electrode detection thresholds, projected fields, quality reports, and electrode health characteristics. ICMS-related adverse events were documented throughout. Results: Over 168 million ICMS pulses were delivered across a combined implant duration of 24 years without any serious adverse events or direct negative effects on electrode health. ICMS consistently evoked sensations localized to the hand. Rarely, sensations persisted for brief periods after stimulation offset (3–25 events across participants). ICMS detection thresholds increased slowly over time (∼3.5 μA/year), but 62±15% of the electrodes still reliably evoke tactile sensations (∼25% decrease in functional electrodes), including 55% of the electrodes after 10 years in one participant. The quality and projected field coverage of ICMS-evoked sensations were both consistent. Conclusions: Delivering ICMS to somatosensory cortex was safe and reliable, consistently evoking informative somatosensory percepts as long as 10 years, demonstrating the clinical promise of ICMS for sensory restoration. (Funded by NIH; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01894802 ).Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying physical degradation alongside recording and stimulation performance of 980 intracortical microelectrodes chronically implanted in three humans for 956-2130 daysActa Biomaterialia, 2025
- A Roadmap for Implanting Electrode Arrays to Evoke Tactile Sensations Through Intracortical StimulationHuman Brain Mapping, 2024
- Microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex evokes task-dependent, spatially patterned responses in motor cortexNature Communications, 2023
- Effects of stimulus pulse rate on somatosensory adaptation in the human cortexBrain Stimulation, 2022
- Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation2011
- The functional consequences of chronic, physiologically effective intracortical microstimulation2011
- Properties of after-discharges from cortical electrical stimulation in focal epilepsiesClinical Neurophysiology, 2004
- Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responsesJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1996
- Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortexMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1990
- Histopathologic evaluation of prolonged intracortical electrical stimulationExperimental Neurology, 1986