The Town Crier: A Use-Case Design and Implementation for a Socially Assistive Robot in Retirement Homes
Authors:
- Ana IglesiasAna Iglesias
- Raquel VicianaRVRaquel Viciana
- José Manuel Pérez-LorenzoJPJosé Manuel Pérez-Lorenzo
- Karine Lan Hing TingKTKarine Lan Hing Ting
- Alberto TudelaATAlberto Tudela
- Rebeca MarfilRMRebeca Marfil
- Malak QbilatMQMalak Qbilat
- Antonio HurtadoAHAntonio Hurtado
- Antonio JerezAJAntonio Jerez
- Juan Pedro BanderaJBJuan Pedro Bandera
Open Access
Abstract
The use of new assistive technologies in general, and Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) in particular, is becoming increasingly common for supporting people’s health and well-being. However, it still faces many issues regarding long-term adherence, acceptability and utility. Most of these issues are due to design processes that insufficiently take into account the needs, preferences and values of intended users. Other issues are related to the currently very limited amount of long-term evaluations, performed in real-world settings, for SARs. This study presents the results of two regional projects that consider as a starting hypothesis that the assessment in controlled environments and/or with short exposures may not be enough in the design of an SAR deployed in a retirement home and the necessity of designing for and with users. Thus, the proposed methodology has focused on use-cases definitions that follow a human-centred and participatory design approach. The main goals have been facilitating system acceptance and attachment by involving stakeholders in the robots design and evaluation, overcoming usage barriers and considering user’s needs integration. The implementation of the first use-case deployed and the two-phase pilot test performed in a retirement home are presented. In particular, a detailed description of the interface redesign process based on improving a basic prototype with users’ feedback and recommendations is presented, together with the main results of a formal evaluation that has highlighted the impact of changes and improvements addressed in the first redesign loop of the system.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Junta de Andalucía (AT17-5509-UMA, UMA18-FEDERJA-074, PID2022-137344OB-C32, RTI2018-099522-A-C44, TED2021-131739B-C21, PDC2022-133597-C42)
- Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía 2014-2020 (AT17-5509-UMA, UMA18-FEDERJA-074, PID2022-137344OB-C32, RTI2018-099522-A-C44, TED2021-131739B-C21, PDC2022-133597-C42)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AT17-5509-UMA, UMA18-FEDERJA-074, PID2022-137344OB-C32, RTI2018-099522-A-C44, TED2021-131739B-C21, PDC2022-133597-C42)
- Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and UC3M (AT17-5509-UMA, UMA18-FEDERJA-074, PID2022-137344OB-C32, RTI2018-099522-A-C44, TED2021-131739B-C21, PDC2022-133597-C42)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrative social robotics, value-driven design, and transdisciplinarityInteraction Studies, 2020
- The CORTEX cognitive robotics architecture: Use casesCognitive Systems Research, 2019
- Using socially assistive robots for monitoring and preventing frailty among older adults: a study on usability and user experience challengesHealth and Technology, 2019
- Mutual Shaping in the Design of Socially Assistive Robots: A Case Study on Social Robots for TherapyInternational Journal of Social Robotics, 2019
- Robots in Retirement Homes: Person Search and Task Planning for a Group of Residents by a Team of Assistive RobotsIEEE Intelligent Systems, 2017
- Implementing monitoring technologies in care homes for people with dementia: A qualitative exploration using Normalization Process TheoryInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2017
- Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2014
- Human-Machine Reconfigurations2006
- A new approach to object-oriented middlewareIEEE Internet Computing, 2004
- A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation**This chapter is a variant version of “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation,” which was printed in Language, 50, 4 (1974), pp. 696–735. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference on “Sociology of Language and Theory of Speech Acts,” held at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research of the University of Bielefeld, Germany. We thank Dr. Anita Pomerantz and Mr. Richard Faumann for pointing out to us a number of errors in the text.1978