Fairness in Winner-Take-All Markets.
Authors:
Preprint
- 30 April 2018
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The paper reports the first experimental study on people’s fairness views on extreme Income inequalities arising from winner-take-all reward structures. We find that the majority of participants consider extreme income inequality generated in winner-take-all situations as fair, independent of the winning margin. Spectators appear to endorse a “factual merit” fairness argument for no redistribution: the winner deserves all the earnings because these earnings were determined by his or her performance. Our findings shed light on the present political debate on redistribution, by suggesting that people may object less to certain types of extreme income inequality than commonly assumed.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Markets Erode Social Responsibility? *The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014
- PREFERENCES FOR REDISTRIBUTION AND PERCEPTION OF FAIRNESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDYJournal of the European Economic Association, 2014
- The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical PerspectiveJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2013
- Top Incomes in the Long Run of HistoryJournal of Economic Literature, 2011
- Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental TestPublic Choice, 2004
- Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003
- Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistributionJournal of Public Economics, 2001
- Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation DecisionsAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and CooperationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- Inequity In Social Exchange1965