Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 72 (3) , 209-214
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining ‘current drinkers’ in national surveys: results of the 2000 National Alcohol SurveyAddiction, 2003
- Towards agreement on ways to measure and report drinking patterns and alcohol-related problems in adult general population surveys: the Skarpö Conference overviewJournal of Substance Abuse, 2000
- Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: experience with graduated frequenciesJournal of Substance Abuse, 2000
- Effects of telephone versus face‐to‐face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumptionAddiction, 2000
- Substance Use Estimates From RDD and Area Probability Samples: Impact of Differential Screening Methods and Unit NonresponsePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1996
- Drinking-related problems in the United States: description and trends, 1984-1990.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1995
- The demographic distribution of US drinking patterns in 1990: description and trends from 1984.American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- Interview Mode Effects in Surveys of Drug and Alcohol Use: A Field ExperimentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1994
- Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing for Household Drug Use SurveysInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1991
- A Comparison of a Prospective Diary and Two Summary Recall Techniques for Recording Alcohol ConsumptionBritish Journal of Addiction, 1989