Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Readiness Assessment Tool: International Consensus Recommendations
Authors:
- Elliot SchiffESElliot Schiff
- Evan J. PropstEPEvan J. Propst
- Karthik BalakrishnanKBKarthik Balakrishnan
- Michael J. BrennerMichael J. Brenner
- Marc‐Mina TawfikMTMarc‐Mina Tawfik
- Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Readiness WorkgroupPWPediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Readiness Workgroup
- Christina J. YangCYChristina J. Yang
- 28 April 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 133 (12) , 3588-3601
Abstract
Objective: To achieve consensus on critical steps and create an assessment tool for actual and simulated pediatric tracheostomy emergencies that incorporates human and systems factors along with tracheostomy‐specific steps.Methods: A modified Delphi method was used. Using REDCap software, an instrument comprising 29 potential items was circulated to 171 tracheostomy and simulation experts. Consensus criteria were determined a priori with a goal of consolidating and ordering 15 to 25 final items. In the first round, items were rated as “keep” or “remove”. In the second and third rounds, experts were asked to rate the importance of each item on a 9‐point Likert scale. Items were refined in subsequent iterations based on analysis of results and respondents' comments.Results: The response rates were 125/171 (73.1%) for the first round, 111/125 (88.8%) for the second round, and 109/125 (87.2%) for the third round. 133 comments were incorporated. Consensus (>60% participants scoring ≥8, or mean score >7.5) was reached on 22 items distributed across three domains. There were 12, 4, and 6 items in the domains of tracheostomy‐specific steps, team and personnel factors, and equipment respectively.Conclusions: The resultant assessment tool can be used to assess both tracheostomy‐specific steps as well as systems factors affecting hospital team response to simulated and clinical pediatric tracheostomy emergencies. The tool can also be used to guide debriefing discussions of both simulated and clinical emergencies, and to spur quality improvement initiatives.Level of Evidence: 5 Laryngoscope, 133:3588–3601, 2023Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency departmentBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practiceBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- Improving Teamwork and Communication in Trauma Care Through In Situ SimulationsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2012
- In Situ, Multidisciplinary, Simulation-Based Teamwork Training Improves Early Trauma CareJournal of Surgical Education, 2011
- Impact of Simulation-Based Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Training in the Simulation Laboratory and Clinical EnvironmentSimulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2011
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- Improving tracheostomy management through design, implementation and prospective audit of a care bundle: how we do itClinical Otolaryngology, 2008
- Measuring Team Performance in Simulation-Based Training: Adopting Best Practices for HealthcareSimulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2008
- Adult outpatient tracheostomy care: Practices and perspectivesOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 2007
- Bridging the gap between the intensive care unit and general wards—the ICU Liaison NurseIntensive and Critical Care Nursing, 2004