Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement
Authors:
- Kathleen E. BickelKathleen E. Bickel
- Kristen McNiffKMKristen McNiff
- Mary K. BussMBMary K. Buss
- Arif KamalAKArif Kamal
- Dale LupuDLDale Lupu
- Amy P. AbernethyAAAmy P. Abernethy
- Michael S. BroderMBMichael S. Broder
- Charles L. ShapiroCSCharles L. Shapiro
- Anupama Kurup AchesonAAAnupama Kurup Acheson
- Jennifer MalinJMJennifer Malin
- Tracey EvansTETracey Evans
- Monika K. KrzyzanowskaMonika K. Krzyzanowska
- 1 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Oncology Practice
- Vol. 12 (9) , e828-e838
Abstract
Purpose: Integrated into routine oncology care, palliative care can improve symptom burden, quality of life, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. However, not all oncology practices have access to specialist palliative medicine. This project endeavored to define what constitutes high-quality primary palliative care as delivered by medical oncology practices. Methods: An expert steering committee outlined 966 palliative care service items, in nine domains, each describing a candidate element of primary palliative care delivery for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden. Using modified Delphi methodology, 31 multidisciplinary panelists rated each service item on three constructs: importance, feasibility, and scope within medical oncology practice. Results: Panelists endorsed the highest proportion of palliative care service items in the domains of End-of-Life Care (81%); Communication and Shared Decision Making (79%); and Advance Care Planning (78%). The lowest proportions were in Spiritual and Cultural Assessment and Management (35%) and Psychosocial Assessment and Management (39%). In the largest domain, Symptom Assessment and Management, there was consensus that all symptoms should be assessed and managed at a basic level, with more comprehensive management for common symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and pain. Within the Appropriate Palliative Care and Hospice Referral domain, there was consensus that oncology practices should be able to describe the difference between palliative care and hospice to patients and refer patients appropriately. Conclusion: This statement describes the elements comprising high-quality primary palliative care for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden, as delivered by oncology practices. Oncology providers wishing to enhance palliative care delivery may find this information useful to inform operational changes and quality improvement efforts.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Generalist plus Specialist Palliative Care — Creating a More Sustainable ModelNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Identifying Patients in Need of a Palliative Care Assessment in the Hospital Setting A Consensus Report from the Center to Advance Palliative CareJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2011
- Estimate of Current Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physician Workforce ShortageJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2010
- Review: Improving end-of-life care: a critical review of the Gold Standards Framework in primary carePalliative Medicine, 2010
- Effects of a Palliative Care Intervention on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced CancerJAMA, 2009
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Program for the Integration of Oncology and Palliative Care: a 5-year review of the Designated Centers’ incentive programAnnals of Oncology, 2009
- Development of the Palliative Care Needs Assessment Tool (PC-NAT) for use by multi-disciplinary health professionalsPalliative Medicine, 2008
- Impact of an Inpatient Palliative Care Team: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2008
- Attitudes of medical oncologists toward palliative care for patients with advanced and incurable cancerCancer, 2003
- The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical ProceduresNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998