RACIAL PROFILING OR RACIST POLICING? BOUNDS TESTS IN AGGREGATE DATA*
Authors:
- John KnowlesJKJohn Knowles
- 28 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Economic Review
- Vol. 45 (3) , 959-989
Abstract
State‐wide reports on police traffic stops and searches summarize very large populations, making them potentially powerful tools for identifying racial bias, particularly when statistics on search outcomes are included. But when the reported statistics conflate searches involving different levels of police discretion, standard tests for racial bias are not applicable. This article develops a model of police search decisions that allows for nondiscretionary searches and derives tests for racial bias in data that mix different search types. Our tests reject unbiased policing as an explanation of the disparate impact of motor‐vehicle searches on minorities in Missouri.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified ParametersEconometrica, 2004
- Can Racially Unbiased Police Perpetuate Long-Run Discrimination?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Racial Bias in Motor Vehicle Searches: Additional Theory and EvidenceSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Road Work: Racial Profiling and Drug Interdiction on the HighwayMichigan Law Review, 2002
- Racial Bias in Motor Vehicle Searches: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Political Economy, 2001
- The Intergenerational Transmission of Welfare Receipt: A Nonparametric Bounds AnalysisReview of Economics and Statistics, 2000
- Nonparametric Analysis of Randomized Experiments with Missing Covariate and Outcome DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted DataEconometrica, 1995
- Crime and Punishment: An Economic ApproachJournal of Political Economy, 1968