In situ estimation of soil hydraulic and hydrodispersive properties by inversion of electromagnetic induction measurements and soil hydrological modeling
Open Access
- 12 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 26 (19) , 5119-5136
Abstract
Soil hydraulic and hydrodispersive properties are necessary for modeling water and solute fluxes in agricultural and environmental systems. Despite the major efforts in developing methods (e.g., laboratory-based, pedotransfer functions), their characterization at applicative scales remains an imperative requirement. Accordingly, this paper proposes a noninvasive in situ method integrating electromagnetic induction (EMI) and hydrological modeling to estimate soil hydraulic and transport properties at the plot scale. To this end, we carried out two sequential water infiltration and solute transport experiments and conducted time-lapse EMI surveys using a CMD Mini-Explorer to examine how well this methodology can be used to (i) monitor water content dynamic after irrigation and to estimate the soil hydraulic van Genuchten–Mualem parameters from the water infiltration experiment as well as (ii) to monitor solute concentration and to estimate solute dispersivity from the solute transport experiment. We then compared the results with those estimated by direct time domain reflectometry (TDR) and tensiometer probe measurements. The EMI significantly underestimated the water content distribution observed by TDR, but the water content evolved similarly over time. This introduced two main effects on soil hydraulic properties obtained by the two methods: (i) similar water retention curve shapes, but underestimated saturated water content from the EMI method, resulting in a scaled water retention curve when compared with the TDR method; the EMI-based water retention curve can be scaled by measuring the actual saturated water content at the end of the experiment with TDR probes or by weighing soil samples; (ii) almost overlapping hydraulic conductivity curves, as expected when considering that the shape of the hydraulic conductivity curve primarily reflects changes in water content over time. Nevertheless, EMI-based estimations of soil hydraulic properties and transport properties were found to be fairly accurate in comparison with those obtained from direct TDR measurements and tensiometer probe measurements.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- European Commission (618127)
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dual‐permeability model for flow in shrinking soil with dominant horizontal deformationWater Resources Research, 2012
- Scaling Approach to Deduce Field Unsaturated Hydraulic Properties and Behavior from Laboratory Measurements on Small CoresVadose Zone Journal, 2006
- Saline tracer visualized with three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: Field‐scale spatial moment analysisWater Resources Research, 2005
- Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agricultureComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2005
- A Review of Advances in Dielectric and Electrical Conductivity Measurement in Soils Using Time Domain ReflectometryVadose Zone Journal, 2003
- Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imagingJournal of Hydrology, 2002
- Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport modelsJournal of Hydrology, 2002
- Using an inverse method to estimate the hydraulic properties of crusted soils from tension-disc infiltrometer dataGeoderma, 1998
- Analysing problems in describing field and laboratory measured soil hydraulic propertiesGeoderma, 1994
- An improved analysis of gravity drainage experiments for estimating the unsaturated soil hydraulic functionsWater Resources Research, 1991