Improving discrimination between clouds and optically thick aerosol plumes in geostationary satellite data
Open Access
- 17 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
- Vol. 15 (9) , 3031-3051
Abstract
Cloud masking is a key initial step in the retrieval of geophysical properties from satellite data. Despite decades of research, problems still exist of over- or underdetection of clouds. High aerosol loadings, in particular from dust storms or fires, are often classified as clouds, and vice versa. In this paper, we present a cloud mask created using machine learning for the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI) aboard Himawari-8. In order to train the algorithm, a parallax-corrected collocated data set was created from AHI and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) lidar data. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were trained on the collocated data to identify clouds in AHI scenes. The resulting neural network (NN) cloud masks are validated and compared to cloud masks produced by the Japanese Meteorological Association (JMA) and the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) for a number of different solar and viewing geometries, surface types and air masses. Here, five case studies covering a range of challenging scenarios for cloud masks are also presented to demonstrate the performance of the masking algorithm. The NN mask shows a lower false positive rate (FPR) for an equivalent true positive rate (TPR) across all categories, with FPRs of 0.160 and 0.259 for the NN and JMA masks, respectively, and 0.363 and 0.506 for the NN and BoM masks, respectively, at equivalent TPR values. This indicates the NN mask accurately identifies 1.13 and 1.29 times as many non-cloud pixels for the equivalent hit rate when compared to the JMA and BoM masks, respectively. The NN mask was shown to be particularly effective in distinguishing thick aerosol plumes from cloud, most likely due to the inclusion of the 0.47 and 0.51 µm bands. The NN cloud mask shows an improvement over current operational cloud masks in most scenarios, and it is suggested that improvements to current operational cloud masks could be made by including the 0.47 and 0.51 µm bands. The collocated data are made available to facilitate future research.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) cloud screening algorithms: validation against collocated MODIS and CALIOP dataAtmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2016
- An Introduction to Himawari-8/9— Japan’s New-Generation Geostationary Meteorological SatellitesJournal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 2016
- Bayesian cloud detection for MERIS, AATSR, and their combinationAtmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015
- Improvement and expansion of the Fmask algorithm: cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection for Landsats 4–7, 8, and Sentinel 2 imagesRemote Sensing of Environment, 2015
- The sea and land surface temperature radiometer (SLSTR) detection assembly design and performance2013
- Automated retrievals of volcanic ash and dust cloud properties from upwelling infrared measurementsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013
- Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOPJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2008
- Saharan dust in nighttime thermal imagery: Detection and reduction of related biases in retrieved sea surface temperatureRemote Sensing of Environment, 2006
- INTRODUCING THE NEXT-GENERATION ADVANCED BASELINE IMAGER ON GOES-RBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2005
- Status and performance of the CALIOP lidar2004