Large-scale assessment of the gliomasphere model system
Authors:
- Dan R. LaksDLDan R. Laks
- Thomas J. CrismanTCThomas J. Crisman
- Michelle Y. S. ShihMSMichelle Y. S. Shih
- Jack MottahedehJMJack Mottahedeh
- Fuying GaoFGFuying Gao
- Jantzen SperryJSJantzen Sperry
- Matthew C. GarrettMGMatthew C. Garrett
- William H. YongWYWilliam H. Yong
- Timothy F. CloughesyTCTimothy F. Cloughesy
- Linda M. LiauLLLinda M. Liau
- Albert LaiALAlbert Lai
- Giovanni CoppolaGCGiovanni Coppola
- 25 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Neuro-Oncology
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1367-1378
Abstract
Gliomasphere cultures are widely utilized for the study of glioblastoma (GBM). However, this model system is not well characterized, and the utility of current classification methods is not clear. We used 71 gliomasphere cultures from 68 individuals. Using gene expression-based classification, we performed unsupervised clustering and associated gene expression with gliomasphere phenotypes and patient survival. Some aspects of the gene expression-based classification method were robust because the gliomasphere cultures retained their classification over many passages, and IDH1 mutant gliomaspheres were all proneural. While gene expression of a subset of gliomasphere cultures was more like the parent tumor than any other tumor, gliomaspheres did not always harbor the same classification as their parent tumor. Classification was not associated with whether a sphere culture was derived from primary or recurrent GBM or associated with the presence of EGFR amplification or rearrangement. Unsupervised clustering of gliomasphere gene expression distinguished 2 general categories (mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal), while multidimensional scaling distinguished 3 main groups and a fourth minor group. Unbiased approaches revealed that PI3Kinase, protein kinase A, mTOR, ERK, Integrin, and beta-catenin pathways were associated with in vitro measures of proliferation and sphere formation. Associating gene expression with gliomasphere phenotypes and patient outcome, we identified genes not previously associated with GBM: PTGR1, which suppresses proliferation, and EFEMP2 and LGALS8, which promote cell proliferation. This comprehensive assessment reveals advantages and limitations of using gliomaspheres to model GBM biology, and provides a novel strategy for selecting genes for future study.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (NS052563)
- California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) Training Grant (TG2-01169)
- NINDS
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- EFEMP2 is upregulated in gliomas and promotes glioma cell proliferation and invasion.2015
- Transcriptional factor specificity protein 1 (SP1) promotes the proliferation of glioma cells by up-regulating midkine (MDK)Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2015
- Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastomaScience, 2014
- Targeted Therapy Resistance Mediated by Dynamic Regulation of Extrachromosomal Mutant EGFR DNAScience, 2014
- EGFRvIII stimulates glioma growth and invasion through PKA-dependent serine phosphorylation of Dock180Oncogene, 2013
- Brain Tumor Stem Cells as Therapeutic Targets in Models of GliomaYonsei Medical Journal, 2010
- Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesisCancer Cell, 2006
- Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profilesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Applying the principles of stem-cell biology to cancerNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Human cortical glial tumors contain neural stem‐like cells expressing astroglial and neuronal markers in vitroGlia, 2002