Pain, Stress and Mental Well‐Being Over Three Generations
Open Access
- 2 September 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European journal of pain
- Vol. 29 (9) , e70110
Abstract
Background: The multifactorial nature of chronic pain should be reflected in pain assessment. The aim of this observational study comparing samples from three generations assessed at different times was to present differences in pain, stress and mental well‐being. Methods: Pain sites, widespread pain, stress (Perceived Stress Scale‐4) and mental well‐being (30‐item General Health Questionnaire) were described across generations from the Malmö neck and shoulder study (parents, Generation 1, n = 12,607), Malmö offspring study, and Malmö Offspring pain study (children and grandchildren, Generation 2, n = 1572; Generation 3, n = 936). Results: Pain prevalence remained comparable across generations. In all generations, women reported more pain sites compared to men, mean difference 1.0 (95% CI 0.9–1.1) in Generation 1, mean difference 1.3 (95% CI 1.0–1.6) in Generation 2, and mean difference 0.9 (95% CI 0.5–1.3) in Generation 3. The frequency of widespread pain for women and men was 28% and 16% in Generation 1, 27% and 12% in Generation 2, and 22% and 15% in Generation 3, respectively. Perceived stress levels were consistently higher in Generation 2 and 3 compared to Generation 1 for both women and men. Among women, mental well‐being remained stable between Generation 1 and 2 but declined significantly in Generation 3 (mean difference 3.2, 95% CI 2.4–4.3). Conclusions: The results suggest significant gender disparities, with women consistently reporting more pain sites, higher stress levels, and reduced mental well‐being compared to men. Furthermore, the findings suggest that generational differences in coping—or other factors—may mitigate the impact of psychosocial distress on pain prevalence, warranting further research. Significance: This study highlights the comparability of pain prevalence across generations despite increasing stress and declining mental well‐being, particularly in women. These findings emphasise the importance of integrating mental health support and gender‐specific coping strategies into pain management, offering insights into biopsychosocial mechanisms underlying the interactions between pain and perceived stress.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive coping strategies in patients with chronic pain conditions and their interpretation of diseaseBMC Public Health, 2010
- Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?Social Science & Medicine, 2008
- The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Incidence of shoulder and neck pain in a working population: effect modification between mechanical and psychosocial exposures at work? Results from a one year follow up of the Malmö shoulder and neck study cohortJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2005
- Self-esteem in a broad-spectrum approach for mental health promotionHealth Education Research, 2004
- Comparison of the GHQ-36, the GHQ-12 and the SCL-90 as psychiatric screening instruments in the Finnish populationNordic Journal of Psychiatry, 2003
- The prevalence of neck painActa Orthopaedica, 2002
- Why GHQ threshold varies from one place to anotherPsychological Medicine, 1998
- Epidemiology of low back painActa Orthopaedica, 1998
- The Factor Structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1989