Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Obese Patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) with Atrial Fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors:
- Paschalis KarakasisPKPaschalis Karakasis
- Nikolaos KtenopoulosNikolaos Ktenopoulos
- Konstantinos PamporisKPKonstantinos Pamporis
- Marios SagrisMarios Sagris
- Stergios SoulaidopoulosSSStergios Soulaidopoulos
- Maria GerogianniMGMaria Gerogianni
- Ioannis LeontsinisIoannis Leontsinis
- George GiannakoulasGeorge Giannakoulas
- Dimitris TousoulisDimitris Tousoulis
- Nikolaos FragakisNikolaos Fragakis
- Konstantinos TsioufisKTKonstantinos Tsioufis
Open Access
- 27 June 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (13) , 3784
Abstract
Background: Real-world data show limited utilization of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) due to concerns regarding their efficacy and safety in this demographic. Aim: This review aimed to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE). The primary efficacy outcome assessed a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism (SE), and myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 28, 2023. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 35 studies involving 434,320 participants were analyzed. DOAC use was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of the composite outcome (RR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.65, 0.98], I2 = 95%), hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 0.58, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88], I2 = 92%), major bleeding (RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.63, 0.92], I2 = 94%), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.49, 0.72], I2 = 88%), and intracranial bleeding (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.34, 0.60], I2 = 44%) compared to warfarin. A non-significant benefit of DOACs was observed for all-cause mortality, MI, the composite of stroke or SE, ischemic stroke, SE, VTE, and minor bleeding compared to warfarin. Subgroup analysis indicated no significant effect modification based on the indication for anticoagulation or study design. Conclusions: DOACs demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in obese individuals compared to warfarin.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence Gaps in the Era of Non–Vitamin K Oral AnticoagulantsJournal of the American Heart Association, 2018
- Relation of Risk of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation to Body Mass Index (from Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation Trial)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2017
- The Effect of Dabigatran Plasma Concentrations and Patient Characteristics on the Frequency of Ischemic Stroke and Major Bleeding in Atrial Fibrillation PatientsJACC, 2014
- Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Oral Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- RivaroxabanClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2011
- Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Obesity and the Risk of New-Onset Atrial FibrillationJAMA, 2004