Effect of antiplatelet therapy on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open Access
- 7 August 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Nephrology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
The benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain controversial. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of antiplatelet therapy on major clinical outcomes. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for trials published before April 2019 without language restriction. We included rrandomized controlled trials that involved adults with CKD and compared antiplatelet agents with controls. Fifty eligible trials that included at least one event were identified, providing data for 27773patients with CKD, including 4518 major cardiovascular events and 1962 all-cause deaths. Antiplatelet therapy produced a 15% (OR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.94) reduction in the odds of major cardiovascular events (P = 0.002), a 48% reduction for access failure events (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31–0.73), but had no significantly effect on all-cause death (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71–1.01) or kidney failure events (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.32–1.55). Adverse events were significantly increased by antiplatelet therapy, including major (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.11–1.59) or minor bleeding (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.27–2.05). Among every 1000 persons with CKD treated with antiplatelet therapy for 12 months, 23 major cardiovascular events will be prevented while nine major bleeding events will occur. Major prevention with antiplatelet agents (cardiovascular events and access failure), might outweigh the risk of bleeding, and there seemed to be an overall net benefit. Individual evaluation and careful monitoring are required.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 201701D221173)
This publication has 85 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)European Heart Journal, 2011
- Use of Aspirin Associates with Longer Primary Patency of Hemodialysis GraftsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2011
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?BMJ, 2008
- Reduced Albuminuria with Sarpogrelate Is Accompanied by a Decrease in Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Levels in Type 2 DiabetesClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2008
- Screening strategies for chronic kidney disease in the general population: follow-up of cross sectional health surveyBMJ, 2006
- Chronic Kidney Disease and the Risks of Death, Cardiovascular Events, and HospitalizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scalesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patientsBMJ, 2002
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986