Relationship between Clinical Outcomes and Vascular Access Type among Hemodialysis Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Authors:
- Jula K. InrigJIJula K. Inrig
- Shelby D. ReedSRShelby D. Reed
- Lynda A. SzczechLSLynda A. Szczech
- John J. EngemannJEJohn J. Engemann
- Joelle Y. FriedmanJFJoelle Y. Friedman
- G. Ralph CoreyGCG. Ralph Corey
- Kevin A. SchulmanKSKevin A. Schulman
- L. Barth RellerLRL. Barth Reller
- Vance G. FowlerVFVance G. Fowler
Open Access
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 1 (3) , 518-524
Abstract
The association between hemodialysis vascular access type, costs, and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) among patients with ESRD remains incompletely characterized. This study was undertaken to compare resource utilization, costs, and clinical outcomes among SAB-infected patients with ESRD by hemodialysis access type. Adjusted comparisons of costs and outcomes were based on multivariable linear regression and multivariable logistic regression models, respectively. A total of 143 hospitalized hemodialysis-dependent patients had SAB at Duke University Medical Center between July 1996 and August 2001. A total of 111 (77.6%) patients were hospitalized as a result of suspected bacteremia; 32 (22.4%) were hospitalized for other reasons. Of the 111 patients, 59.5% (n = 66) had catheters as their primary access type, 36% (n = 40) had arteriovenous (AV) grafts, and 4.5% (n = 5) had AV fistulas. Patients with fistulas were excluded from analyses because of small numbers. Patients with catheters were more likely to be white, had shorter dialysis vintage, and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores compared with patients with grafts. Unadjusted 12-wk mortality did not significantly differ between patients with catheters compared with patients with grafts (22.7 versus 10.0%; P = 0.098); neither did 12-wk costs differ by access type ($22,944 ± 18,278 versus $23,969 ± 13,731, catheter versus graft; P > 0.05). In adjusted analyses, there was no difference in 12-wk mortality (odds ratio 1.63; 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 9.02; catheter versus graft) or 12-wk costs (means ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.17; catheter versus graft) among SAB-infected patients with ESRD on the basis of hemodialysis access type. Twelve-week mortality and costs that are associated with an episode of SAB are high in hemodialysis patients, regardless of vascular access type. Efforts should focus on the prevention of SAB in this high-risk group.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Dialysis Dose and Membrane on Infection-Related Hospitalization and DeathJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2003
- Vascular access and increased risk of death among hemodialysis patientsKidney International, 2002
- Vascular access use in Europe and the United States: Results from the DOPPSKidney International, 2002
- Bacteremia associated with tunneled dialysis catheters: Comparison of two treatment strategiesKidney International, 2000
- Bacteremia associated with tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis cathetersAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1999
- The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: Hate living with them, but can’t live without themKidney International, 1999
- The Economic Impact of Staphylococcus aureus Infection in New York City HospitalsEmerging Infectious Diseases, 1999
- New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findingsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1994
- American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus ConferenceCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- APACHE II-A Severity of Disease Classification SystemCritical Care Medicine, 1986