Alternatives for skin sensitisation: Hazard identification and potency categorisation: Report from an EPAA/CEFIC LRI/Cosmetics Europe cross sector workshop, ECHA Helsinki, April 23rd and 24th 2015
- 1 November 2015
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
- Vol. 73 (2) , 660-666
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assayToxicology in Vitro, 2015
- Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network‐based risk assessment model of skin sensitizationJournal of Applied Toxicology, 2015
- Categorization of Chemicals According to Their Relative Human Skin Sensitizing PotencyDermatitis®, 2014
- Skin sensitisation – Moving forward with non-animal testing strategies for regulatory purposes in the EURegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2013
- Putting the parts together: Combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentialsRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2012
- A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testingALTEX, 2012
- Contact sensitizers modulate the arachidonic acid metabolism of PMA-differentiated U-937 monocytic cells activated by LPSToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2011
- Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010Archives of Toxicology, 2011
- Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACHContact Dermatitis, 2009
- ICCVAM Evaluation of the Murine Local Lymph Node AssayRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2001