Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes
Authors:
- Eduardo P.C. RochaEREduardo P.C. Rocha
- John Maynard SmithJSJohn Maynard Smith
- Laurence D. HurstLHLaurence D. Hurst
- Matthew T.G. HoldenMHMatthew T.G. Holden
- Jessica E. CooperJCJessica E. Cooper
- Noel H. SmithNSNoel H. Smith
- Edward J. FeilEFEdward J. Feil
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Vol. 239 (2) , 226-235
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicatesTrends in Genetics, 2004
- Small change: keeping pace with microevolutionNature Reviews Microbiology, 2004
- Gradual evolution in bacteria: evidence from Bacillus systematicsMicrobiology, 2003
- DNA repeats lead to the accelerated loss of gene order in bacteriaTrends in Genetics, 2003
- Patterns of Intra- and Interhost Nonsynonymous Variation Reveal Strong Purifying Selection in Dengue VirusJournal of Virology, 2003
- The genome sequence of Bacillus anthracis Ames and comparison to closely related bacteriaNature, 2003
- What are Bacterial Species?Annual Review of Microbiology, 2002
- The origins of acquired immune deficiency syndrome viruses: where and when?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2001
- CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choiceNucleic Acids Research, 1994
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985