Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire
Authors:
- Carol TenopirCarol Tenopir
- Kenneth LevineKenneth Levine
- Suzie AllardSuzie Allard
- Lisa ChristianLisa Christian
- Rachel VolentineRachel Volentine
- Reid BoehmReid Boehm
- Frances NicholsFrances Nichols
- David NicholasDavid Nicholas
- Hamid R. JamaliHamid R. Jamali
- Eti HermanEti Herman
- Anthony WatkinsonAnthony Watkinson
- 23 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Vol. 67 (10) , 2344-2361
Abstract
An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.Keywords
Funding Information
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingPsychological Science, 2012
- Retracted Science and the Retraction IndexInfection and Immunity, 2011
- Perceived value of scholarly articlesLearned Publishing, 2011
- Google Generation II: web behaviour experiments with the BBCAslib Proceedings, 2011
- The information enfranchisement of the digital consumerAslib Proceedings, 2010
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey DataPLOS ONE, 2009
- Credibility on the internet: shifting from authority to reliabilityJournal of Documentation, 2008
- The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resourcesJournal of Information Science, 2007
- Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open accessBiomedical Digital Libraries, 2007
- An Integrative Model Of Organizational TrustAcademy of Management Review, 1995