A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine formula Kaixinsan decoction for depression
Open Access
- 5 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 103 (1) , e36719
Abstract
Background: Kaixinsan (KXS) decoction is a traditional Chinese herbal formulation commonly used to treat depression. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KXS, which is widely used, alone and in combination with other therapies, for the treatment of depression. The main objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of KXS in the treatment of depression as a single agent or in combination with other methods. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of KXS in the treatment of depression were systematically searched from several Chinese and English databases with no language restriction. Patients in these studies met the relevant diagnostic criteria for depression. Data on HAMD, SDS, practical situations, and occurrence of side effects in the studies were extracted. Finally, the methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the Jadad scale and Cochrane bias evaluation tool. Results: Twelve studies with 1034 patients were included after screening. The Jadad scale and Cochrane bias evaluation tool indicated that the quality of the studies ranged from fair to good, with 41.7% categorized as good and 58.3% as poor. Egger test and funnel plots showed that the publication bias remain low. Conclusion: The results showed that the frequency of side effects in the control group was higher than that in the treatment group, and there was a statistically significant difference. KXS was comparable or superior to antidepressants in treating depression and has fewer side effects. The data analysis showed that effectiveness and other indicators differed significantly by geographic area and dosage form, which has implications for future clinical work.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of mifepristone on uterine leiomyoma in premenopausal women: a meta-analysisFertility and Sterility, 2013
- Severity classification on the Hamilton depression rating scaleJournal of Affective Disorders, 2013
- Chinese Herbal Formula Xiao Yao San for Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled TrialsEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug TrialsDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2001
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- The Biochemistry of Affective DisordersThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1967
- A Self-Rating Depression ScaleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1965
- A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSIONJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1960