A Deep Learning Approach to Refine the Identification of High-Quality Clinical Research Articles From the Biomedical Literature: Protocol for Algorithm Development and Validation
Authors:
- Wael AbdelkaderWAWael Abdelkader
- Tamara NavarroTNTamara Navarro
- Rick ParrishRPRick Parrish
- Chris CotoiCCChris Cotoi
- Federico GerminiFGFederico Germini
- Lori-Ann LinkinsLLLori-Ann Linkins
- Alfonso IorioAIAlfonso Iorio
- R Brian HaynesRHR Brian Haynes
- Sophia AnaniadouSASophia Ananiadou
- Lingyang ChuLCLingyang Chu
- Cynthia LokkerCLCynthia Lokker
Open Access
- 29 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Research Protocols
- Vol. 10 (11) , e29398
Abstract
Background: A barrier to practicing evidence-based medicine is the rapidly increasing body of biomedical literature. Use of method terms to limit the search can help reduce the burden of screening articles for clinical relevance; however, such terms are limited by their partial dependence on indexing terms and usually produce low precision, especially when high sensitivity is required. Machine learning has been applied to the identification of high-quality literature with the potential to achieve high precision without sacrificing sensitivity. The use of artificial intelligence has shown promise to improve the efficiency of identifying sound evidence. Objective: The primary objective of this research is to derive and validate deep learning machine models using iterations of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to retrieve high-quality, high-relevance evidence for clinical consideration from the biomedical literature. Methods: Using the HuggingFace Transformers library, we will experiment with variations of BERT models, including BERT, BioBERT, BlueBERT, and PubMedBERT, to determine which have the best performance in article identification based on quality criteria. Our experiments will utilize a large data set of over 150,000 PubMed citations from 2012 to 2020 that have been manually labeled based on their methodological rigor for clinical use. We will evaluate and report on the performance of the classifiers in categorizing articles based on their likelihood of meeting quality criteria. We will report fine-tuning hyperparameters for each model, as well as their performance metrics, including recall (sensitivity), specificity, precision, accuracy, F-score, the number of articles that need to be read before finding one that is positive (meets criteria), and classification probability scores. Results: Initial model development is underway, with further development planned for early 2022. Performance testing is expected to star in February 2022. Results will be published in 2022. Conclusions: The experiments will aim to improve the precision of retrieving high-quality articles by applying a machine learning classifier to PubMed searching. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/29398Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- MEDLINE clinical queries are robust when searching in recent publishing yearsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2013
- An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analysesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2012
- Search Filters for Finding Prognostic and Diagnostic Prediction Studies in Medline to Enhance Systematic ReviewsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Optimized retrieval of primary care clinical prediction rules from MEDLINE to establish a web-based registerJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- MedlineRanker: flexible ranking of biomedical literatureNucleic Acids Research, 2009
- Towards Automatic Recognition of Scientifically Rigorous Clinical Research EvidenceJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2009
- A coherent graph-based semantic clustering and summarization approach for biomedical literature and a new summarization evaluation methodBMC Bioinformatics, 2007
- Second-Order Peer Review of the Medical Literature for Clinical PractitionersJAMA, 2006
- Text Categorization Models for High-Quality Article Retrieval in Internal MedicineJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2004
- Identifying Diagnostic Studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the Number Needed to ReadJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2002