Commentary: Reporting standards are needed for evaluations of risk reclassification

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:

• Evaluating the Incremental Value of New Biomarkers With Integrated Discrimination Improvement
  American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
• Problems With Risk Reclassification Methods for Evaluating Prediction Models
  American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
• Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Risk Prediction Studies: The GRIPS Statement
  PLOS Medicine, 2011
• Use of reclassification for assessment of improved prediction: an empirical evaluation
  International Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
• One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers
  BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
• Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers
  Statistics in Medicine, 2010
• Advances in Measuring the Effect of Individual Predictors of Cardiovascular Risk: The Role of Reclassification Measures
  Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009
• Assessing the Value of Risk Predictions by Using Risk Stratification Tables
  Annals of Internal Medicine, 2008
• Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond
  Statistics in Medicine, 2007
• Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction
  Circulation, 2007