Transition Power Abstractions for Deep Counterexample Detection
Open Access
- 30 March 2022
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 524-542
Abstract
While model checking safety of infinite-state systems by inferring state invariants has steadily improved recently, most verification tools still rely on a technique based on bounded model checking to detect safety violations. In particular, the current techniques typically analyze executions by unfolding transitions one step at a time, and the slow growth of execution length prevents detection of deep counterexamples before the tool reaches its limits on computations. We propose a novel model-checking algorithm that is capable of both proving unbounded safety and finding long counterexamples. The idea is to use Craig interpolation to guide the creation of symbolic abstractions ofexponentially longer sequences of transitions. Our experimental analysis shows that on unsafe benchmarks with deep counterexamples our implementation can detect faulty executions that are at least an order of magnitude longer than those detectable by the state-of-the-art tools.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficient generation of craig interpolants in satisfiability modulo theoriesACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2010
- FAST: acceleration from theory to practiceInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 2008
- Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver2008
- Accelerating Interpolation-Based Model-Checking2007
- An interpolating theorem proverTheoretical Computer Science, 2005
- Applications of Craig Interpolants in Model Checking2005
- Interpolation and SAT-Based Model Checking2003
- Lower bounds for resolution and cutting plane proofs and monotone computationsThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1997
- Interpolation theorems, lower bounds for proof systems, and independence results for bounded arithmeticThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1997
- Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theoryThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1957