On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Vol. 103 (481) , 61-73
Abstract
We are often interested in estimating sensitivity and specificity of a group of raters or a set of new diagnostic tests in situations in which gold standard evaluation is expensive or invasive. Num...Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Performance of Commercially Available Enzyme Immunoassays for Detection of Antibodies against Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in African PopulationsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2004
- A Cautionary Note on the Robustness of Latent Class Models for Estimating Diagnostic Error without a Gold StandardBiometrics, 2004
- Accounting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Assessment of Diagnostic TestsBiometrics, 2003
- Estimating the Conditional False-Positive Rate for Semi-Latent DataEpidemiology, 2002
- Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed modelsBiometrika, 2001
- Diagnosis of Gastric Cancers: Comparison of Conventional Radiography and Digital Radiography with a 4 Million-Pixel Charge-coupled DeviceRadiology, 2000
- A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1994
- Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests Under Nonstandard ConditionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- The Analysis of Multivariate Binary DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1972