Quantifying long‐term post‐fire sediment delivery and erosion mitigation effectiveness
- 3 November 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Vol. 45 (3) , 771-782
Abstract
Large wildfires can have profound and lasting impacts not only from direct consumption of vegetation but also longer‐term effects such as persistent soil erosion. The 2002 Hayman Fire burned in one of the watersheds supplying water to the Denver metropolitan area; thus there was concern regarding hillslope erosion and sedimentation in the reservoirs. The efficacy of various treatments for reducing erosion was tested, including hand scarification on contour, agricultural straw mulch, wood mulch, burned controls and unburned reference plots. Simulated rill erosion experiments were used both immediately after the fire and again 10 years post fire. To better understand untreated recovery, the same experiments were applied to control plots in post‐fire years 1, 2, 3 and 4, and in unburned reference plots in years 4 and 10. Results indicate that control and scarified plots produced significantly greater sediment flux rates – 1.9 and 2.8 g s−1 respectively – than the straw and wood mulch treatments – 0.9 and 1.1 g s−1 – immediately after the fire. Mulch treatments reduced runoff rate, runoff velocity, and sediment concentration and flux rate. The straw mulch cover was no longer present, whereas the wood mulch was still there in year 10. Vegetation regrowth was slow and mulch treatments provided effective cover to reduce sediment right after the fire. In post‐fire year 10, there were no significant differences in sediment flux rates across treatments; it is notable, however, that the wood mulch treatment (0.09 g s−1) most closely approached the unburned condition (0.07 g s−1). The burned control plots had high sediment flux rates until post‐fire year 3, when flux rates significantly decreased and were statistically no longer higher than the unburned levels from year 4 and 10. These results will inform managers of the longer‐term post‐fire sediment delivery rates and of the ability of post‐fire emergency hillslope treatments to mitigate erosion rates. Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.Keywords
This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydrologic conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfireWater Resources Research, 2012
- Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: Demonstrating the need for “source water supply and protection” strategiesWater Research, 2011
- An evaluation of three wood shred blends for post-fire erosion control using indoor simulated rain events on small plotsCATENA, 2010
- Effectiveness of aerial seeding and straw mulch for reducing post-wildfire erosion, north-western Montana, USAInternational Journal of Wildland Fire, 2008
- Quantification of hillslope runoff and erosion processes before and after wildfire in a wet Eucalyptus forestJournal of Hydrology, 2007
- Effects of fire‐induced water repellency on soil aggregate stability, splash erosion, and saturated hydraulic conductivity for different size fractionsHydrological Processes, 2007
- Influence of vegetation recovery on water erosion at short and medium-term after experimental fires in a Mediterranean shrublandCATENA, 2007
- Changes in sediment loads and discharge from small mountain catchments following wildfire in south eastern AustraliaJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- Native plant regeneration and introduction of non-natives following post-fire rehabilitation with straw mulch and barley seedingForest Ecology and Management, 2004
- The role of fire and soil heating on water repellency in wildland environments: a reviewJournal of Hydrology, 2000