ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China
Authors:
- Xiangqiang LiuXLXiangqiang Liu
- Qingqing YangQYQingqing Yang
- Kai WeiKWKai Wei
- Peng-Fei DaiPDPeng-Fei Dai
Top Cited Papers
- 15 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Research in International Business and Finance
- Vol. 70
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial reporting and disclosure practices in ChinaJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2023
- Stock price reactions to ESG news: the role of ESG ratings and disagreementReview of Accounting Studies, 2022
- Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performanceCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2021
- Local bias in investor attention: Evidence from China's Internet stock message boardsJournal of Empirical Finance, 2016
- Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatilityJournal of Corporate Finance, 2015
- Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchersStrategic Management Journal, 2015
- Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatilityJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2011
- Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2009
- R2 around the world: New theory and new tests☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2006
- Stock return variancesJournal of Financial Economics, 1986