Students’ conceptions of underlying principles in medical physiology: an interview study of medical students’ understanding in a PBL curriculum
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Advances in Physiology Education
- Vol. 31 (4) , 364-369
Abstract
Medical physiology is known to be a complex area where students develop significant errors in conceptual understanding. Students’ knowledge is often bound to situational descriptions rather than underlying principles. This study explores how medical students discern and process underlying principles in physiology. Indepth interviews, where students elaborated on principles related to blood pressure and blood pressure regulation, were carried out with 16 medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum. A qualitative, phenomenographic approach was used, and interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, qualitatively analyzed, and categorized. Four categories were outlined. The underlying principles were conceived as follows: 1) general conditions for body function at a specified time point, 2) transferable phenomena between organ systems and time points, 3) conditionally transferable phenomena between organ systems and time points, and 4) cognitive constructions of limited value in medical physiology. The results offers insights into students’ thinking about underlying principles in physiology and suggest how understanding can be challenged to stimulate deep-level processing of underlying principles rather than situational descriptions of physiology. A complex conception of underlying principles includes an ability to problemize phenomena beyond long causal reasoning chains, which is often rewarded in traditional examinations and tests. Keywords for problemized processing are as follows: comparisons, differences, similarities, conditions, context, relevance, multiple sampling, connections, and dependencies.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Student approaches to achieving understanding—approaches to learning revisitedStudies in Higher Education, 2007
- Enhancing active learning in the student laboratoryAdvances in Physiology Education, 2004
- Disciplinary differences or modes of curriculum practice? Who promised to deliver what in problem‐based learning?Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2003
- Using “Concept Sorting” to Study Learning Processes and OutcomesAcademic Medicine, 2002
- The mechanisms of analogical learning1989
- Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition1989
- Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogyCognitive Science, 1983
- Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning OutcomesHigher Education, 1979
- ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASKBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976
- ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976