Feasibility of a New Application of Noninvasive Brain Computer Interface (BCI): A Case Study of Training for Recovery of Volitional Motor Control After Stroke
Authors:
- Roger ChengRCRoger Cheng
- Jean RogersJRJean Rogers
- Krisanne LitinasKLKrisanne Litinas
- Kenneth HrovatKHKenneth Hrovat
- Mark DohringMDMark Dohring
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
- Vol. 33 (4) , 203-211
Abstract
A large proportion of individuals with stroke have persistent deficits for which current interventions have not restored normal motor behavior. Noninvasive brain computer interfaces (BCIs) have potential advantages for restoration of function. There are also potential advantages for combining BCI with functional electrical stimulation (FES). We tested the feasibility of combined BCI + FES for motor learning after stroke. The participant was a 43-year-old woman who was 10 months post-stroke. She was unable to produce isolated movement of any of the digits of her involved hand. With effort she exhibited simultaneous mass hyperextension of metacarpal phalangeal joints of all four fingers and thumb with simultaneous flexion of proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints of all fingers. Brain signals from the lesioned hemisphere were used to trigger FES for movement practice. The BCI + FES intervention consisted of trials of either attempted finger movement and relax conditions or imagined finger movement and relax conditions. The training was performed three times per week for three weeks (nine sessions total). : The participant exhibited highly accurate control of brain signal in the first session for attempted movement (97%), imagined movement (83%), and some difficulties with attempted relaxation (65%). By session 6, control of relaxation (deactivation of brain signal) improved to >80%. After nine sessions (three per week) of BCI + FES intervention, the participant demonstrated recovery of volitional isolated index finger extension. BCI + FES training for motor learning after stroke was feasible. A highly accurate brain signal control was achieved, and this signal could be reliably used to trigger the FES device for isolated index finger extension. With training, volitional control of isolated finger extension was attained in a small number of sessions. The source of motor recovery could be attributable to BCI, FES, combined BCI + FES, or whole arm or hand motor task practice.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitationThe Lancet Neurology, 2008
- Putting the Brain on the Map: Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess and Induce Cortical Plasticity of Upper-Extremity MovementPhysical Therapy, 2007
- Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysisThe Journal of Physiology, 2007
- Construction of Efficacious Gait and Upper Limb Functional Interventions Based on Brain Plasticity Evidence and Model-Based Measures For Stroke PatientsThe Scientific World Journal, 2007
- Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damageCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 2006
- Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function 3 to 9 Months After StrokeJAMA, 2006
- Classifying EEG and ECoG signals without subject training for fast BCI implementation: comparison of nonparalyzed and completely paralyzed subjectsIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2006
- Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscularJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2005
- Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeysThe Journal of Neuroscience, 1996
- To Be Aware or Not Aware? What to Think about while Learning and Performing a Motor SkillThe Sport Psychologist, 1993