Does knowledge influence visual attention? A comparative analysis between archaeologists and naïve subjects during the exploration of Lower Palaeolithic tools
Open Access
- 26 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
- Vol. 14 (6) , 1-10
Abstract
The role of experience during the exploration of lithic artefacts can be been investigated through multiple approaches. Knowledge can influence visual perception of the environment, whilst action “affordances” can be processed at the first sight of an object. In this study, we used eye tracking to analyse whether and to what extent archaeological knowledge can influence visuospatial attention whilst interacting with stone tools. Archaeologists were found to pay more visual attention to the middle region and the knapped surface. Differences between the visual exploration of choppers and handaxes were also found. Although the general pattern of distribution of the visual attention was similar to naïve subjects, participants with archaeological experience paid more attention to functionally relevant regions. Individuals with archaeological experience directed more attention to the upper region and the knapped surface of the tools, whilst naïve participants spent more time viewing the middle region. We conclude that although both groups could direct their attention to action relevant features in stone tools, functional affordances had a greater effect in subjects with previous experience. Affordances related to manipulation triggered lower attention and showed no differences between participants.Keywords
Funding Information
- Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León (EDU/574/2018)
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PGC2018-093925-B-C31)
- Universidad de Burgos
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objectsExperimental Brain Research, 2013
- Object Affordances Tune Observers' Prior Expectations about Tool-Use BehaviorsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touchingPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011
- Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objectsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2010
- The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributionsJournal of Vision, 2007
- Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday lifeProgress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2006
- Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special?Cognitive Brain Research, 2005
- The neural bases of complex tool use in humansTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004
- Haptically creating affordances: The user-tool interface.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2003
- Evidence for visuomotor priming effectNeuroReport, 1996