The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 May 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in Perspectives on Medical Education
- Vol. 4 (3) , 119-127
Abstract
Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) has started to find more applications in medical education research. Unfortunately, misconceptions such as lower cognitive load always being beneficial to learning and the continued use of dated concepts and methods can result in improper applications of CLT principles in medical education design and research. This review outlines how CLT has evolved and presents a synthesis of current-day CLT principles in a holistic model for medical education design. This model distinguishes three dimensions: task fidelity: from literature (lowest) through simulated patients to real patients (highest); task complexity: the number of information elements; and instructional support: from worked examples (highest) through completion tasks to autonomous task performance (lowest). These three dimensions together constitute three steps to proficient learning: (I) start with high support on low-fidelity low-complexity tasks and gradually fade that support as learners become more proficient; (II) repeat I for low-fidelity but higher-complexity tasks; and (III) repeat I and II in that order at subsequent levels of fidelity. The numbers of fidelity levels and complexity levels within fidelity levels needed depend on the aims of the course, curriculum or individual learning trajectory. This paper concludes with suggestions for future research based on this model.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learningMedical Teacher, 2011
- Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need?Educational Psychology Review, 2011
- Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive LoadEducational Psychology Review, 2010
- Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive LoadEducational Psychology Review, 2010
- Learner Performance in Multimedia Learning Arrangements: An Analysis Across Instructional ApproachesAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2009
- Assessment of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning Using Dual-Task MethodologyExperimental Psychology, 2002
- Over the top: Are there exceptions to the basic capacity limit?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2001
- Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficultyErgonomics, 1998
- Why Some Material Is Difficult to LearnCognition and Instruction, 1994
- What do students learn while solving mathematics problems?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1985