“Minimally biased” g-loadings of crystallized and non-crystallized abilities
- 31 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Intelligence
- Vol. 34 (5) , 469-477
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating subtest ‘g’ saturation levels via the single trait-correlated uniqueness (STCU) SEM approach: Evidence in favor of crystallized subtests as the best indicators of ‘g’Intelligence, 2006
- Gc and Gf are both valid intelligence factors: Commentary on Robinson (2005)Personality and Individual Differences, 2005
- Problems with the method of correlated vectorsIntelligence, 2005
- A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory and Cross-Age Invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities III.School Psychology Quarterly, 2004
- Which is the real intelligence? A reply to Robinson (1999)Personality and Individual Differences, 2001
- Fluid Intelligence, Crystallized Intelligence, and the Openness/Intellect FactorJournal of Research in Personality, 2000
- The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities: Test of the structure of intelligence across the life spanIntelligence, 1995
- What is a good g?Intelligence, 1994
- The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligenceIntelligence, 1983
- The Bi-Factor MethodPsychometrika, 1937