Implant impingement during internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The effect of implant configuration and scapula anatomy: A biomechanical study
- 1 March 2016
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Biomechanics
- Vol. 33, 111-116
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- DePuy Synthes (2012-0006)
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motionJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2015
- Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesisActa Orthopaedica, 2010
- Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: Range of motion and risk of scapular notchingJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2009
- The biomechanics of reverse anatomy shoulder replacement – A modelling studyClinical Biomechanics, 2009
- Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplastyJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2008
- Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder modelJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2008
- The Use of the Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for the Treatment of Failed Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Humeral FractureJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007
- Use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty in patients with glenohumeral arthritis and rotator cuff deficiencyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Reverse Total Shoulder ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2006
- Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanicsJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2005