Is There Indication for the Use of Biological Mesh in Cancer Patients?
Authors:
- Renato PatroneRenato Patrone
- Maddalena LeongitoMLMaddalena Leongito
- Raimondo di GiacomoRGRaimondo di Giacomo
- Andrea BelliABAndrea Belli
- Raffaele PalaiaRPRaffaele Palaia
- Alfonso AmoreAAAlfonso Amore
- Vittorio AlbinoVAVittorio Albino
- Mauro PiccirilloMPMauro Piccirillo
- Carmen CutoloCCCarmen Cutolo
- Sergio ColucciaSCSergio Coluccia
- Aurelio NastoANAurelio Nasto
- Giovanni ConzoGCGiovanni Conzo
Open Access
- 13 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (20) , 6035
Abstract
Up to 28% of all patients who undergo open surgery will develop a ventral hernia (VH) in the post-operative period. VH surgery is a debated topic in the literature, especially in oncological patients due to complex management. We searched in the surgical database of the Hepatobiliary Unit of the National Cancer Institute of Naples “G. Pascale Foundation” for all patients who underwent abdominal surgery for malignancy from January 2010 to December 2018. Our surgical approach and our choice of mesh for VH repair was planned case-by-case. We selected 57 patients that fulfilled our inclusion criteria, and we divided them into two groups: biological versus synthetic prosthesis. Anterior component separation was used in 31 patients (54.4%) vs. bridging procedure in 26 (45.6%). In 41 cases (71.9%), we used a biological mesh while a synthetic one was adopted in the remaining patients. Of our patients, 57% were male (33 male vs. 24 female) with a median age of 65 and a mean BMI of 30.8. We collected ventral hernia defects from 35 cm2 to 600 cm2 (mean 205.2 cm2); 30-day complications were present in 24 patients (42.1%), no 30-day mortality was reported, and 21 patients had a recurrence of pathology during study follow-up. This study confirms VH recurrence risk is not related with the type of mesh but is strongly related with BMI and type of surgery also in oncological patients.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysisSurgery, 2017
- Component Separation vs. Bridged Repair for Large Ventral Hernias: A Multi-Institutional Risk-Adjusted Comparison, Systematic Review, and Meta-AnalysisSurgical Infections, 2016
- Chemotherapy does not adversely impact outcome following post‐incisional hernia repair with biomaterial meshJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2015
- Primary Fascial Closure with Mesh Reinforcement Is Superior to Bridged Mesh Repair for Abdominal Wall ReconstructionJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2013
- The role of biologic meshes in abdominal wall reconstructionColorectal Disease, 2012
- Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia researchHernia, 2011
- Long‐term Follow‐up of Open and Laparoscopic Repair of Large Incisional HerniasWorld Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Chemotherapy and patient co-morbidity in ventral site hernia developmentJournal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2009
- PSEUDO‐R2 MEASURES FOR SOME COMMON LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELSJournal of Economic Surveys, 1996
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958