Second‐line therapy in young patients with relapsed or refractory orbital rhabdomyosarcoma
- 24 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Ophthalmologica
- Vol. 99 (3) , 334-341
Abstract
Objective: Localized orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (oRMS) has an overall favourable prognosis with more than 90% of survival. Little is known about the best strategy in recurrent/refractory (R/R) cases. The purpose is to examine the characteristics of patients with R/R‐oRMS, focusing on local therapy.Methods: This is bicentric retrospective study. Analysis is of young patients (<30 years) with R/R‐oRMS who were treated from 1989 to 2018 at the Institut Curie and Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, France.Results: Twenty‐seven out of 162 patients (17%) with oRMS presented with R/R disease. 6 of these patients had alveolar RMS (22%), 3 of whom had initial parameningeal extension (11%). During first‐line treatment, 18 patients (67%) had orbital radiotherapy. Median age at R/R was 10 years (ranges: 4–28) after a delay of 19 months from diagnosis (ranges: 3–40). Tumoral events were local relapses (22 cases), local progression (3 cases) or regional relapses (2 cases). Second‐line treatments included chemotherapy (27 cases), radiotherapy (16 cases), surgery (exenteration; 8 cases) and metastasis/ nodal removal (3 cases). After a median follow‐up of 99 months (range: 10–306), 4 patients died and 23 are in complete remission (CR) without treatment. One patient had subsequent relapse treated with exenteration and brachytherapy until a new tumour remission. Five‐year event‐free and overall survivals after first tumour event are, respectively, 84.4% (95% confidence interval: 71.5%–98.8%) and 85.8% (95% confidence interval: 72.1%–100.0%)Conclusion: R/R‐oRMS is a rare situation. Second‐line therapy is efficient in this location, sometime at the cost of lifesaving mutilating surgery. Second‐line local therapy needs therefore to consider local radiotherapy if possible or complete wide surgery.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome of patients with localized orbital sarcoma who relapsed following treatment on Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) Protocols‐III and ‐IV, 1984–1997: A report from the Children's Oncology GroupPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2012
- Randomized Comparison of Intensified Six-Drug Versus Standard Three-Drug Chemotherapy for High-Risk Nonmetastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma and Other Chemotherapy-Sensitive Childhood Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Long-Term Results From the International Society of Pediatric Oncology MMT95 StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Current State-of-the-Art Systemic Therapy for Pediatric Soft Tissue SarcomasCurrent Oncology Reports, 2012
- Prognostic Factors After Relapse in Nonmetastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Nomogram to Better Define Patients Who Can Be Salvaged With Further TherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Treatment of Nonmetastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma in Childhood and Adolescence: Third Study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology—SIOP Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 89Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Treatment for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: the cost of cureThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- RhabdomyosarcomaSurvey of Ophthalmology, 2003
- Rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck in children☆☆Presented at: American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Annual Meeting Essay Section, Chicago, Illinois, May 2001.Oral Oncology, 2002
- Prognostic factors in 951 nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in children: A report from the international rhabdomyosarcoma workshopMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1991
- Topography of Childhood Tumors: Pediatric Coding SystemPediatric Hematology and Oncology, 1986