Re: Guyton, Kathryn Z., Barone, Stanley, Jr., Brown, Rebecca C., Euling, Susan Y., Jinot, Jennifer, Makris, Susan (2008). Mode of Action Frameworks: A Critical Analysis.Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 11(1): 16–31

This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:

• Conflicting Views on Chemical Carcinogenesis Arising from the Design and Evaluation of Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies
  Environmental Health Perspectives, 2008
• IPCS Framework for Analyzing the Relevance of a Noncancer Mode of Action for Humans
  Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2008
• Key Issues in the Modes of Action and Effects of Trichloroethylene Metabolites for Liver and Kidney Tumorigenesis
  Environmental Health Perspectives, 2006
• Key Issues in the Role of Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor Agonism and Cell Signaling in Trichloroethylene Toxicity
  Environmental Health Perspectives, 2006
• IPCS Framework for Analyzing the Relevance of a Cancer Mode of Action for Humans
  Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2006
• A Risk Assessment Perspective: Application of Mode of Action and Human Relevance Frameworks to the Analysis of Rodent Tumor Data
  Toxicological Sciences, 2005
• Case Study: Weight of Evidence Evaluation of the Human Health Relevance of Thiamethoxam-Related Mouse Liver Tumors
  Toxicological Sciences, 2005
• Inhaled Formaldehyde: Exposure Estimation, Hazard Characterization, and Exposure-Response Analysis
  Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 2003
• Is peroxisome proliferation an obligatory precursor step in the carcinogenicity of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)?
  Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
• Chloroform: An EPA Test Case
  Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999