Eucalyptus globulus Afforestation Reduces Invertebrate Richness and Diversity in Streams

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Intensive forestry, particularly the establishment of monospecific plantations with exotic species, can deeply impact the ecological functioning of forest streams, where riparian leaf litter is the primary source of energy. In this study, we investigated the effects of Eucalyptus globulus afforestation on macroinvertebrate communities in 20 streams in Galicia (NW Spain) with varying levels of accumulated eucalypt leaf litter. Sampling was done in autumn 2020 and spring 2021. In autumn, six streams had leaf litter composed of >50% of eucalypt leaves, a proportion that increased to 12 streams in spring. A total of 24,705 individuals were found in autumn and 12,529 in spring, belonging to 125 taxa. Although some taxa decreased their abundance with an increase in the proportion of eucalypt litter, variability in overall macroinvertebrate abundance was mainly explained by season, stream flow, and water temperature. However, species richness and diversity were significantly lower in streams mainly subsided by Eucalyptus litter compared to those dominated by native riparian vegetation. Macroinvertebrate abundance, richness, and diversity peaked in autumn, coinciding with the influx of deciduous litterfall and lower proportion of eucalypt litter. The lower quality, low-nutrient content, and presence of feeding deterrents in Eucalyptus leaf litter compared to native deciduous tree species likely drive these observed patterns, underscoring the importance of preserving native riparian forests to sustain stream biodiversity, even in managed landscapes dominated by Eucalyptus plantations.
Funding Information
  • Margarita Salas Fellowship (REC-SALAS-21, PGC2018-096656-B-I00, 304710/2019-9)
  • ACR from MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and from “ERDF A way of making Europe” by the “European Union” (REC-SALAS-21, PGC2018-096656-B-I00, 304710/2019-9)
  • The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (REC-SALAS-21, PGC2018-096656-B-I00, 304710/2019-9)

This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit: