Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Carpal Tunnel Release Using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Mayo Wrist Scores: A Prospective Observational Study
Open Access
- 17 March 2026
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 18 (3) , e105359
Abstract
Background Carpal tunnel syndrome is a neuropathic compressive condition caused by median nerve compression as it travels into the wrist through the carpal tunnel. Validated patient-reported outcome measures such as the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and the Mayo Wrist Score are commonly used to assess outcomes following carpal tunnel release; however, limitations remain in interpreting whether observed score changes are clinically meaningful from the patient’s perspective. The primary objective of this study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the Mayo Wrist Score after isolated carpal tunnel release, and secondarily to contextualize postoperative QuickDASH change using previously reported clinically meaningful thresholds. Methodology This prospective study included adult patients undergoing isolated carpal tunnel release at two tertiary hospitals. QuickDASH and Mayo Wrist Scores were recorded preoperatively and at the six-month follow-up. MCID and SCB were calculated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods, with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis primarily applied to the Mayo Wrist Score. Results A total of 92 patients were enrolled, of whom 73 completed the six-month follow-up. The anchor-based MCID for the Mayo Wrist Score was 11.5 points (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.77), while the SCB threshold was 13.5 points (AUC = 0.91). Significant postoperative improvements were observed in both QuickDASH and Mayo Wrist Scores. Conclusions Establishing MCID and SCB values for the Mayo Wrist Score and contextualizing change in the QuickDASH score provides a clinically meaningful framework for interpreting patient-reported outcomes following carpal tunnel release.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Version 2.0 in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity PopulationThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2021
- Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Carpal Tunnel Release Using the PROMIS PlatformThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2019
- Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors in Conservatively Managed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic ReviewArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2016
- Minimal Clinically Important Differences of 3 Patient-Rated Outcomes InstrumentsThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2013
- Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndromeClinical Rheumatology, 2010
- Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and Physical Measurements in Outcome Studies of Distal Radius Fracture TreatmentThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2007
- Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in a General PopulationJAMA, 1999
- Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head)American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1996
- Measurement of health statusControlled Clinical Trials, 1989