Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Authors:
- 1 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 37 (2) , 330-335
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplastyThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2020
- Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results—a systematic review of the literatureMUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2019
- Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literatureArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2018
- Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2016
- Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Knee ArthroplastyJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2015
- Impact of the Economic Downturn on Total Joint Replacement Demand in the United StatesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2014
- Are Cementless Stems More Durable Than Cemented Stems in Two-stage Revisions of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasties?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2014
- Metaphyseal Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Indications and TechniquesJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2011
- Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007
- Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003