Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment
Author:
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
- Vol. 43 (1) , 51-58
Abstract
Shifting laws and regulations increasingly displace the centrality of women’s needs in the provision of abortion services. Lawmakers and judges contribute to this environment in two ways: by protecting the right of “Crisis Pregnancy Centers” (CPCs) to give false and misleading information about abortion and by supporting legislation mandating that abortion providers give misleading and unnecessary information for the purposes of informed consent. Litigation on informed consent is further complicated through the mobilization of facts — such as the gestational age or sonogram of the fetus — delivered with the intent to dissuade women from accessing abortion. In other words, factual information utilized for ideological purpose.First Amendment litigation has done little to help prioritize women’s access to appropriate information about abortion that is calibrated to their needs.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical Evidence and Expertise in Abortion JurisprudenceAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 2015
- The Public Health Risks of Crisis Pregnancy CentersPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2012
- Informed Consent in Clinical CareJAMA, 2011
- LIST OF REVIEWERS OCTOBER 2009-SEPTEMBER 2010Human Resource Management Journal, 2011
- Abortion Incidence and Access to Services In the United States, 2008Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2011
- Dignity and the Politics of Protection: Abortion Restrictions under Casey/CarhartThe Yale Law Journal, 2008