Comparative Cardiovascular Safety Profiles of Atenolol, Bisoprolol, and Nebivolol: A Pharmacovigilance Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Preprint
- 2 September 2026
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
Background: Beta-blockers are widely prescribed across cardiovascular indications, yet their real-world cardiovascular adverse-event profiles across drug generations remain incompletely characterized in large pharmacovigilance datasets. Objective: To compare the cardiovascular safety profiles of atenolol, bisoprolol and nebivolol using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Retrospective disproportionality analysis of FAERS reports via OpenVigil 2.1, covering each drug’s available reporting history through January 1st, 2026. Cardiovascular events were identified with Standardized MedDRA Queries; signals were assessed with the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR, 95% CI) and Information Component (IC) under Evans’ criteria. Individual case safety reports were analysed for demographics, seriousness and outcomes. Results: Atenolol was most strongly associated with bradycardia (ROR = 10.513) and left ventricular hypertrophy (ROR = 6.765). Bisoprolol showed the highest signals for diastolic dysfunction (ROR = 24.875), atrial tachycardia (ROR = 23.283) and chronic cardiac failure (ROR = 23.222), together with the highest bradycardia-associated mortality (14.9%). Nebivolol had the lowest overall reporting burden, though counts are not exposure-adjusted; its strongest signals were bradycardia (ROR = 9.619) and coronary artery stenosis (ROR = 9.351), with lower bradycardia mortality (12.6%). Pediatric reports (0–17 years) occurred for all three agents at similar proportions, none FDA-approved in this group. Reports predominantly involved older adults (60–89 years), with a substantial proportion classified as serious. Conclusion: All three agents generated significant signals across a broad range of cardiovascular events, with nebivolol showing the most favourable profile. Because FAERS disproportionality cannot establish causality, these hypothesis-generating findings may inform beta-blocker selection in older or higher-risk patients, particularly those prone to bradyarrhythmias or diastolic dysfunction, pending prospective confirmation.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Version 1, 2026-09-02, Preprints
- Published version: Cardiovascular Medicine, 29 (4), 41.
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemoperitoneum caused by spontaneous rupture of a leiomyoma: A case reportCase Reports in Women's Health, 2024
- Beta-Blockers in Pregnancy: Clinical UpdateCurrent Hypertension Reports, 2023
- Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaboration, 1990-2021JACC, 2022
- Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019JACC, 2020
- The Real Role of β-Blockers in Daily Cardiovascular TherapyAmerican Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2017
- Beta-Blockers in HypertensionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2010
- Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reportingPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009
- Adverse Effects of β-Blocker Therapy for Patients With Heart FailureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2004
- Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenololThe Lancet, 2002
- Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reportsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2001