Perplexing Results From the PRAETORIAN Trial: Revisiting the Debate About the Value of Antitachycardia Pacing
- 1 February 2022
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 145 (5) , 330-332
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved survival in patients enrolled promptly into remote monitoring following cardiac implantable electronic device implantationJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016
- 2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testingEP Europace, 2015
- HRS Expert Consensus Statement on remote interrogation and monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devicesHeart Rhythm, 2015
- Effect of Long-Detection Interval vs Standard-Detection Interval for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators on Antitachycardia Pacing and Shock DeliveryJAMA, 2013
- Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality through ICD ProgrammingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- The implantable cardioverter defibrillator: its history, current psychological impact and futureExpert Review of Medical Devices, 2009
- Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks in MADIT IIJACC, 2008
- Amiodarone or an Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator for Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection FractionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996