Causes of inconsistency in diagnosing and classifying intraductal proliferations of the breast

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:

• Interobserver reproducibility of the Lagios nuclear grading system for ductal carcinoma in situ*1, *2
  Human Pathology, 1999
• Prediction of local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five histological classifications: A comparative study with long follow-up
  Human Pathology, 1998
• Statewide Study of Diagnostic Agreement in Breast Pathology
  JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
• A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS): correlation with grade of associated invasive carcinoma
  Histopathology, 1996
• Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ
  The Lancet, 1995
• Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: Findings of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme
  European Journal of Cancer, 1994
• Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of Ductal Proliferative Breast Lesions Using Standardized Criteria
  American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1992
• Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia
  Human Pathology, 1992
• Borderline Epithelial Lesions of the Breast
  American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1991
• Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Women with Proliferative Breast Disease
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1985