Taxation of social insurance and redistribution: a comparative analysis of ten welfare states
Authors:
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of European Social Policy
- Vol. 13 (1) , 21-33
Abstract
Welfare state regimes vary in their strategies of redistribution. Some welfare states have extensive taxable social insurance schemes, while others rely more on non-taxable means-tested benefits. In order to assess the distributive effects of different programme types, it is necessary to analyse social insurance after taxes, something rarely practised in comparative research. In this paper, we evaluate distributive effects of social insurance after taking taxes into account in 10 welfare states. The main question is to what extent income taxes affect the contribution of social insurance to income inequality. The conclusion is that taxation may have important consequences for both inter- and intra-country comparisons of income redistribution, especially if countries with similar social policy systems are compared. The analyses are based on micro-level income data from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). Les formes de redistribution varient d'un Etat Providence à l'autre. Certains ont des programmes d'assurance sociale étendus soumis à taxation alors que d'autres s'appuient plus sur des allocations sous condition de ressource non-taxables. Afin d'évaluer les effets redistributifs des différents types de programme, il est nécessaire de prendre en compte les effets de la fiscalité, ce qui est rarement le cas dans les analyses comparatives. Nous évaluons dans cet article les effets redistributifs après taxe dans 10 pays. La principale question est de savoir jusqu'à quel point la fiscalité sur les revenus modifie la contribution de l'assurance sociale à la réduction des inégalits de revenu. Notre conclusion est que fiscalité peut avoir des conséquences importantes pour les comparaisons en terme de redistribution des revenus tant entre les pays qu'à l'intérieur de ceux-ci, particulièrement lorsque l'on compare des pays ayant des systèmes sociaux similaires. Cette analyse se fonde sur les données de revenu au niveau micro de provenant de la `Luxembourg Income Study' (LIS).Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do means-tested benefits alleviate poverty?: Evidence on Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom from the Luxembourg Income StudyJournal of European Social Policy, 2000
- The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western CountriesAmerican Sociological Review, 1998
- Inequality in Five Countries in the 1980s: The Role of Demographic Shifts, Markets and Government PoliciesEconomica, 1997
- THE DISAGGREGATION OF THE GIN1 COEFFICIENT BY FACTOR COMPONENTS AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO AUSTRALIAReview of Income and Wealth, 1993
- The Public-Private Mix in Pension PolicyInternational Journal of Sociology, 1990
- Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights During Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries Since 1930American Sociological Review, 1989
- Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Applications to the United StatesReview of Economics and Statistics, 1985
- The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family IncomesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Economics of Income Redistribution1983
- Two Decompositions of Concentration RatioJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1969